<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A 3-minute fairy tale of mixed emoticons: Rives on TED.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ted.com/2008/10/28/a_3minute_fairy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ted.com/2008/10/28/a_3minute_fairy/</link>
	<description>The TED Blog shares interesting news about TED, TEDTalks video, the TED Prize and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lockman</title>
		<link>http://blog.ted.com/2008/10/28/a_3minute_fairy/comment-page-1/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Lockman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-staging.ted.com/2008/10/a_3minute_fairy/#comment-990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, Rives does a magnificent job of taking our assumptions about language and standing them on their heads.  We tend to forget that language is a living, growing, changing thing, holding on to the familiar forms even after they are no longer useful.  Movable type has existed for centuries; typewriters for more than a hundred years; why are emoticons such a recent development?  What &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thoughtoffice.com/?page_id=449&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new forms of expression&lt;/a&gt; will the next 20 years bring?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, Rives does a magnificent job of taking our assumptions about language and standing them on their heads.  We tend to forget that language is a living, growing, changing thing, holding on to the familiar forms even after they are no longer useful.  Movable type has existed for centuries; typewriters for more than a hundred years; why are emoticons such a recent development?  What <a href="http://www.thoughtoffice.com/?page_id=449" rel="nofollow">new forms of expression</a> will the next 20 years bring?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
