A US soldier who said no to torture

Posted by: Tedstaff

The Washington Post has a fascinating story of a US interrogator, pseudonymed “Matthew Alexander,” who refused to use aggressive interrogation tactics sanctioned by the military — because, as he puts it:

These interrogations were based on fear and control; they often resulted in torture and abuse.

This is the same idea Philip Zimbardo shares in his TEDTalk, when he examines the horrors at Abu Ghraib — that a policy of control, fear and dehumanization can open the door for evil. In his own work, Alexander took another path:

I refused to participate in such practices, and a month later, I extended that prohibition to the team of interrogators I was assigned to lead. I taught the members of my unit a new methodology — one based on building rapport with suspects, showing cultural understanding and using good old-fashioned brainpower to tease out information. … We got to know our enemies, we learned to negotiate with them, and we adapted criminal investigative techniques. … It worked.

Read the full story here >>
Read a review of Matthew Alexander’s new book, How to Break a Terrorist >>

Comments (3)

  • alan buchanan commented on Dec 5 2008

    Getting a “confession” from someone this way, isnt a confession. It is just someone who will say anything to stop getting tortured.
    elottery syndicate

  • Ozzy Robin commented on Dec 4 2008

    US has lately been using a lot of wrongful tactics to extract info out of the prisoners. This post is a pleasant surprise..

  • Mike Linley commented on Dec 4 2008

    wow good to know there is still some decent people out there who still do what is right! thanks!