Hassine Labaied is here to talk wind. Specifically, wind power. ”Wind is clean, free, perpetually renewable and widely distributed across the globe,” he says. “Yet the current main wind technology, the turbine, is still based on a windmill system.” And existing turbines are terribly inefficient: 70% of wind power is simply lost, while the devices are also expensive and unreliable.
Labaied’s solution is inspired by sails, not blades. He describes what he’s calling “Zero-Blade” technology. He shows video of a “dancing dish,” designed to convert the kinetic energy of wind to electricity.
He has some stats to share. By removing some of the most expensive components of a wind turbine, it is possible to slash costs by 50%. The system can store energy to be deployed at a later stage via hydraulic accumulators, solving a big problem with existing systems. And it’s efficient, able to capture twice as much kinetic energy as a conventional wind turbine. “The aerodynamic design and the motion enables it to literally swallow a big part of the wind,” he says lyrically.
Yes, there are still many questions to be answered, he acknowledges. But tests are promising and suggest that the system might be twice as efficient as the original system. “On top of that, it is bird-friendly, almost silent, and it offers a good visual integration into the landscape.”
Labaied concludes his short talk optimistically and poetically: “Some of you might think it’s too good to be true. but the history of human evolution has taught us that nothing is out of reach. The overwhelming majority of innovation came from places that are least expected,” he says. “Our dream is to take this innovation to the next level and to contribute to the global efforts to make this world a better and a cleaner place for the next generation.”
Photo: James Duncan Davidson
































Pingback: Invest carefully: wind energy innovations are rarely kosher | YES! to renewables
Pingback: Invest carefully; wind energy ‘innovations’ are rarely kosher | barnard on wind
Pingback: To Prevent Wind Turbines From Killing Birds, Add Blinds? | ccnew
Pingback: To Prevent Wind Turbines From Killing Birds, Add Blinds? « Music RSS
Pingback: Constructing kinetic worlds: the futuristic films of TED Fellow Kibwe Tavares | LiMiT
Mike Barnard commented on Dec 8 2012
Looks as if TED’s recent email to TEDx folks should be read by TED organizers. The Saphon is at best a sign of deluded principals and at worst a sign of intent to delude investors.
The patent doesn’t describe the device they have, they claim to exceed Betz’ Limit which no one has come close to and they claim much greater efficiency than other wind generation devices yet publish no numbers to back this up.
The principals have no background in wind energy yet claim miracles.
Pity that TED provided them such an excellent marketing platform. It should be removed.
http://www.quora.com/Wind-Power/Are-stationary-circular-sails-the-future-of-wind-power
Pingback: “Instead of harvesting wind energy with rotating blades, the Saphonian uses a sort of round sail held in a frame. « SavePHP.org Pleasure House Point is 122 acres and can be preserved forever with your help. Thanks to VB City Council for voting
Pingback: A Wind Turbine Safe for Wildlife! | American Solar Energy Society
Pingback: Stuff We Need: Better Wind Turbines, Part II | Fish & Bicycles
Pingback: The Saphonian Wind Turbine Ditches Blades for a More Efficient and Less Expensive Design | Inhabitat - Sustainable Design Innovation, Eco Architecture, Green Building
Pingback: TED: Are there any TED talks that specialists in the field think are ridiculous / overstated / wrong? - Quora
Douglas Jack commented on Aug 19 2012
An associated huge loss with distant location wind farms is a 5% per 100 mile electric energy loss in power line transmission, usually 50% by the time the consumer (industry, commercial, institutional or domestic) plugs in to the remaining current. If the Saphonian zero-blade, non-rotation technology can be used on the concentrated wind shear surfaces of urban roof-tops, building-edges & river-valley bridges which concentrate wind force by 10 to 15 times, then we don’t need to create rural transmission-line deserts. We should as well be tapping into or mimicking the ability of trees to convert wind-energy into the ATP energy unit for cell-function as well as glucose production through photo-synthesis as another energy unit. Harnessing of nature’s complementary energies should be the human design process & goal. http://www.indigenecommunity.info
Ketan Joshi commented on Aug 10 2012
It’s worth noting that in the marketing video for Saphon Energy, they parrot the claims of anti-wind groups, notably that conventional wind turbines cause nausea, insomnia and headaches. There’s no scientific evidence to support these claims – they are manufactured by anti-wind lobby groups in Canada, the USA and in Australia, most of which are linked to the fossil fuel industry.
TED is a bastion of scientific progress, rationality and innovation. This company seems to resort to superstition, pseudoscience and fictitious health scares to sell their technology.
Was a TED talk really the right forum for a company that happily embraces techno-phobia, and the imposition of fear and anxiety on communities hosting wind farms?
John Rusk commented on Aug 5 2012
I would like to know more about this. It sounds too good to be true