<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spotting neuro-fiction: A guide to dissecting overblown neuroscience headlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-headlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-headlines/</link>
	<description>The TED Blog shares interesting news about TED, TEDTalks video, the TED Prize and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:08:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan McCann</title>
		<link>http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-headlines/comment-page-1/#comment-30475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendan McCann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ted.com/?p=66445#comment-30475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In regards to the study showing that a brain picture on an article led readers to agree more with the article&#039;s conclusions: I would be interested to see if an article with a random image, and an article with a relevant non-brain image fared as well. I write a blog, and have significantly better responses to any article that includes an image. That said, I will have to try a brain soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the study showing that a brain picture on an article led readers to agree more with the article&#8217;s conclusions: I would be interested to see if an article with a random image, and an article with a relevant non-brain image fared as well. I write a blog, and have significantly better responses to any article that includes an image. That said, I will have to try a brain soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spotting neuro-fiction: A guide to dissecting overblown neuroscience headlines &#124; NewsSource</title>
		<link>http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-headlines/comment-page-1/#comment-26847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spotting neuro-fiction: A guide to dissecting overblown neuroscience headlines &#124; NewsSource]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 23:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ted.com/?p=66445#comment-26847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-h... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-h" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-h</a>&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Articles of Interest &#8211; December 21, 2012 &#171; National Creativity Network</title>
		<link>http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-headlines/comment-page-1/#comment-26577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Articles of Interest &#8211; December 21, 2012 &#171; National Creativity Network]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ted.com/?p=66445#comment-26577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Neuro-fiction: A guide to dissecting overblown neuroscience headlines TED Blog [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neuro-fiction: A guide to dissecting overblown neuroscience headlines TED Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven AERTS</title>
		<link>http://blog.ted.com/2012/12/18/spotting-neuro-fiction-a-guide-to-dissecting-overblown-neuroscience-headlines/comment-page-1/#comment-26348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sven AERTS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ted.com/?p=66445#comment-26348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gloating = enjoying other people&#039;s suffering]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gloating = enjoying other people&#8217;s suffering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
