Is the Earth maxed out, or should we be optimistic abut being able to solve our future? At TED2012 last week, Paul Gilding made the case for the former, and Peter Diamandis argued for the latter. And then: they debated onstage. Watch the video above to find out what happened.
Want to talk about it too? Paul Gilding just started a TED Conversation to continue the debate. Join the conversation >>
Comments (30)
Pingback: La columna de Bilinkis y Garbulsy: El Futuro, parte I | Basta de Todo
Pingback: The Peter v. Paul Debate: Are We Too Optimistic (and Too Blind) About the Power (and Limits) of Technology? « Zoe Weil
Pingback: Amazing Human Peter Diamandis | NosyAss®.com
Pingback: TED speakers who disagree with each other | Insatiable Minds
Pingback: A glimpse to the future | A constant improving era
Pingback: Paul Gilding: The Earth is full | Video on TED.com « mawillits
Pingback: 'Cornucopians in Space' Deliver a Dangerously Misguided Message | Gregor.us
Pingback: ‘Cornucopians in Space’ Deliver a Dangerously Misguided Message « Investment Watch Blog
Pingback: TED2012 remixed: It’s Time for TED | 2012: What's the 'real' truth?
Pingback: Is George Osborne questioning capitalism? « FlourishingEnterprise
Pingback: TED Talk: Peter Saul on Dying in the 21st Century: « Under The LobsterScope
Pingback: Is George Osborne questioning capitalism? | Left Foot Forward
Pingback: Ecology as a science needs to understand innovation « future facts blog
Pingback: Paul Gilding: The Earth is full « This Day – One Day
Pingback: Abundance is Our Future | so far so good