Powerfull “in-your-shoes” experiment.

I’d say though, that mixing the reasons for which americans and other participant countries to eastern-orient wars is not a good thing. It leads to more confusion. There is no doubt that the war reasons, especially those in discussion, are not related to religion, but only to power, control, money, resources.

The people from Iraq or Afganisthan wouldn’t relate the invasion to christianism, if they weren’t told so.
It’s manipulation. More than that, you cannot call anyone with a Bible in his hand a Christian. This is a big confusion that western world generated since the Great Schism, almost 1000 years ago, when Catholic church split from the One Single Church and took a wrong path. The mistake lead to multiple division of thousands of christian confesions, which unfortunately created a bad image. Hence, that guy who burned the Q’uran cannot be called a Christian by all means. That’s why, in my oppinion is not fair to simply generalize and call all christian denominations “Christians”. I would always add their denomination, such a “catholic” or “protestant” or “adventist”, “baptist”. etc.

And it’s ridiculos to say that american army is Christian, in a country where most of the public institutions are secularized.

But other than that, yes, congratulations for giving a very sensitive look to those issues.